I want to buy a used 6-seat single engine airplane? - seat engine strategy
Which airline is better? Mirage? Saratoga? Cessna 210? Or there is a better deal there?
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Seat Engine Strategy I Want To Buy A Used 6-seat Single Engine Airplane?
8 comments:
You really do not say enough about what "best".
When considering the purchase of an aircraft is considered seriously their task and their budget. How far will you fly? How often? In many people? How much has to spend to buy? Such as insurance, hangar, maintenance and operating costs per hour?
So the best thing I can do, you made a few suggestions.
I left the Beech Bonanza A36 at the top of the list of the 6 seats. It is a company that flies the quality is very good. The first models were the limited cargo space. All doors are wide passenger in the back of people and goods. You can create a family of six and a fuel is very reasonable.
The Cherokee Six is a budget-conscious alternative to the Bonanza. It is well built, but I think your load is greater.
The Cessna 210 is a more conscious choice. It is not as fast as the other two I do not think, but has the advantage of the wing for high visibility. One is available in print version, andone of the few single-engine aircraft, which can be equipped for the certification of well-known ice.
Here are some sites that may be helpful:
FOR SALE - Www.aso.com Company
www.controller.com - Airplanes for sale
www.trade-a-plane.com - selling planes (subscription required)
www.aopa.org - information on how to buy a plane
www.aeroprice.com - Evaluation software simply airplanes and information on how to buy
I want a Saratoga or Cherokee 6th El Mirage & 210 are money pits of biblical proportions.
If money is not the Socata TBM 850 would be my choice.
Cherokee six years, an excellent value. C-185, expensive but well appreciated and a great artist.
Beechcraft brings the best out of it with the A36.
I flew the Cherokee Six and comparable (with the luxury and space for a lot cheaper at the expense of speed and quality of the birth of the fly as sh **). No spear, or Saratoga, winning a pair of knots, does not justify the increased costs of maintenance headaches (y).
210 is good, I had never been known to do, unless a glaze suicidal. Theft of 206 and is decent (a little narrower than the Cherokee Six), but offer more value and benefits for a small reduction in speed compared to 210 (150 mph vs. 190mph).
I had the opportunity to fly in 1968 T-210. While low on fuel and suck like no other, at a height that is the same with all similar devices. The biggest thing I saw with the 210, plus the speed and class, we all have is stability. I bonanzas flow (of course, V-35, A-36) and they are all "plan for a pilot" (ie, loads of fun to fly), but they are somewhat unstable. Under the shake Bonanza that never seem quite finished, was impressed. Of the 210, however, if the flies straight as an arrow, with almost no user input. be cut (without the 210, we still have all of this is isolation so they can fly without a helmet and not to shout to communicate).
The big problem with 210 is the maintenance and reputation. Not as bad as it is, but has some problems.
I have a Piper Cherokee, so I find it difficult to admit the 210 is the
best option. (but) Depending on your mission, of course.
Well, I think the Mirage is well above Saratoga and 210
The P210 and Saratoga are birds of Nice. There is also a Beech Bonanza, that you can actually see the weight and balance.
Good luck with the choice and decide, not for those who have helped us and give us a ride to remember.
If he had a personal level from me, I bought a 747th I want to fly around and shit PUMA villages fall in the rear roof part. How much money you have. You probably could not afford, a 747th Make sure that if a plane falls on the roofs of peoples leads Puma. It is a great joy.
Post a Comment